Thomas Phillip Nehez v. National Transportation Safety Board and Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration

Good Law
30 F.3d 1165·94 Daily Journal DAR 10438·1994 WL 385174·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18740·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5695
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 26, 199493-70764California1,376 words

Opinion

Opinion

Schroeder, J.

Opinion by Judge SCHROEDER.

Thomas Phillip Nehez petitions for review of the National Transportation Safety Board’s (“NTSB”) decision that he violated Federal Aviation Regulation 91.9. He contends that there was no evidence that he had “endangered the life or property of another” within the meaning of that regulation. He also contends that the Administrator’s sanction, suspension of his airline transport pilot’s license for thirty days, was arbitrary and capricious. We affirm because the NTSB applied the correct standard in determining that Nehez violated § 91.9, because its decision is supported by the evidence, and because we need not consider the severity of the sanction in light of the fact that the sanction has been waived and will never be imposed.

On January 6, 1990, Thomas Nehez served as the second in command on America West Airlines flight" 19 departing from Des Moines, Iowa. According to Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”) regulations, a pilot executing a take-off must comply with the visibility requirements set forth in each airline’s FAA-approved operations specifications manual. For this particular flight, America West operations specifications required a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.