United States v. Lomas

Bad Law
30 F.3d 1191·94 Daily Journal DAR 10514·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 19087·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5770
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 27, 199493-50655California1,960 words

Opinion

Opinion

30 F.3d 1191 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Manuel Bustamante LOMAS, aka: Manuel Lomas Bustamante; Manuel Bustaman; Manuel Bustamante Gonzalez; Manuel Bustamante; Manuel Manuel Bustamante Gonzales; Porfirio Cadena; Juan Alvarado Mendoza; Martin Garary Camacho; Manuel Alvarado Gonzalez; Manuel Bustamente Lomas, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50655. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 7, 1994. Decided July 27, 1994. Teresa Alva, Deputy Federal Public Defender, Los Angeles, CA, for defendant-appellant. Miriam A. Krinsky and Robert Y. Lewis, Asst. U.S. Attys., Los Angeles, CA, for plaintiff-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before: FARRIS, O'SCANNLAIN, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. TROTT, Circuit Judge: 1 Manuel Bustamante-Lomas appeals his conviction and sentence for illegal reentry after deportation and conviction for an aggravated felony in violation of 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1326 (b)(2). He claims his prior state conviction for the sale or transportation of cocaine was not an "aggravated felony." We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3742 , and we…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.