Louis W. Brock v. David B. Weston, Superintendent, Special Commitment Center

Good Law
31 F.3d 887·94 Daily Journal DAR 10862·1994 WL 398238·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 19786·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5966
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 3, 199492-36783California2,122 words

Opinion

Opinion

Reinhardt, J.

Louis W. Brock, currently confined pursuant to the Washington Sexually Violent Predators Act at the Special Commitment Center of the Washington State Penitentiary, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his pro se 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. In his petition, Brock challenges the constitutionality of his 1974 assault conviction. Although the sentence imposed for this conviction expired in 1984, Brock alleges that the state relied on the conviction, at least in part, in the proceedings resulting in his 1991 confinement as a “sexually violent predator.”

The district court ruled that Brock was not “in custody” under § 2254 for the purpose of challenging his 1974 conviction because Brock had already finished serving the sentence imposed pursuant to that conviction. We disagree. Following Feldman v. Perrill, 902 F.2d 1445 (9th Cir.1990), we construe Brock’s petition as a challenge to his current confinement as predicated upon his prior expired conviction. Accordingly, we reverse and remand to the district court for further proceedings.

I.

In 1974, Brock pled guilty to the offense of second degree assault, a violation of Section…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.