Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro v. Lerner

Good Law
31 F.3d 924
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 15, 199492-16596California3,457 words

Opinion

Opinion

31 F.3d 924 RICO Bus.Disp.Guide 8618 PILLSBURY, MADISON & SUTRO, a California corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Abraham Avi LERNER; Jonathan Beare; Christopher Ellis; Michael Katz; Richard Bergman; Baxter Ellis Inc.; Fifty-Fivecal Corp.; 114 Sansome Associates, Ltd.; Nathanna Financial Corp.; Vertovest Properties, Inc.; Alan Lawrence Lee; Maurice Debbah; Princeton Investments PLC; Princeton Sansome Corp.; 114 Sansome Street Ltd. Partnership; Princeton San Fran, Inc.; Zapala N.V. c/o Curacao Corp. Co. N.V.; Jones Lang Wootton USA; Jones Lang Wootton US Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-16596. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 10, 1994. Decided Aug. 15, 1994. John J. Bartko, Bartko, Welsh, Tarrant & Miller, San Francisco, CA, for plaintiff-appellant. Stephen V. Bomse, Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe, Roger B. Mead, Folger & Levin, San Francisco, CA; Mark D. Plevin, Crowell & Moring, Washington, DC; Jeffrey T. Golenbock, Golenbock, Eiseman, Assor & Bell, New York City, for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before: POOLE, BEEZER, and T.G.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.