Ralph Barnett v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.

Good Law
32 F.3d 413·94 Daily Journal DAR 10933·1994 WL 400819·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20172·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5998
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 4, 199493-15390California2,151 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hug, J.

Ralph Barnett belonged to Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. (“Kaiser”), a Health Maintenance Organization (“HMO”). After consulting with various doctors about his deteriorating health condition, Barnett formally requested financial approval from Kaiser for a liver transplant. Kaiser denied Barnett coverage. Following an expedited trial, the district court denied Barnett’s request for a permanent injunction requiring Kaiser to pay for the costs of his liver transplant. Barnett appeals that decision. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292 , and we affirm.

I.

FACTS AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

Ralph Barnett is inflicted with Hepatitis B, further classified as e-antigen positive. The “e-antigen positive” characterization indicates that he is infected with a large amount of the virus and that the virus is replicating rapidly outside the liver. E-antigen positive status carries with it a greater risk that a new liver could become infected with the virus.

Barnett, through his employment with Magnolia Upholstery, entered into an ERISA-regulated service agreement with Kaiser in 1990. Kaiser contracts with The Permanente Medical Group (“Medical Group”) to provide health services to its…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.