In Re Prize Frize, Inc., Debtor. Encino Business Management, Inc. v. Prize Frize, Inc. U.S. Trustee

Good Law
32 F.3d 426·94 Daily Journal DAR 11166·1994 WL 424675·25 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1615·31 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1422
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 9, 199493-55422California1,507 words

Opinion

Opinion

Noonan, J.

This case, of first impression in any circuit, turns on whether license fees, paid by a licensee for the use of technology, patents, and proprietary rights, are “royalties” within the meaning of 11 U.S.C. § 365 (n)(2)(B) and, as such, must continue to be paid after the licensor in bankruptcy has exercised its statutory right to reject the contract.

FACTS

With slight alterations we adopt the concise statement of facts made by the BAP, In re Prize Frize, Inc., 150 B.R. 456 (9th Cir. BAP 1993):

The debtor, Prize Frize, Inc., is the owner and licensor of all technology, patents, proprietary rights and related rights used in the manufacture and sale of a french fry vending machine. ■ On March 6, 1991, the debtor entered into a License Agreement granting an exclusive license to utilize the proprietary rights and to manufacture, use and sell the vending machine. In consideration for the license to use the proprietary information and related rights, the licensee agreed to pay the debtor a $1,250,000 license fee — $300,000 to be paid within ten days of execution of the agreement with the balance due in $50,000 monthly payments. The licensee also agreed to pay royalty payments based on a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.