McDowell v. United States

Good Law
32 F.3d 572·1994 WL 390013
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 25, 199493-35200California481 words

Opinion

Opinion

32 F.3d 572 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Sam E. McDOWELL; John Alsworth; Mary Alsworth, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America; United States Department of Interior; Manuel J. Lujan, Jr., in his official capacity as secretary of the interior, Defendants-Appellees, and Kenaitze Indian Tribe and Alaska Federation of Natives, Defendants-Intervenors. No. 93-35200. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 9, 1994. Decided July 25, 1994. Before: WIGGINS and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges, and EZRA, District Judge. * MEMORANDUM ** Sam E. McDowell and other individuals and organizations appeal the district court's grant of summary judgment against them on their claims challenging the constitutionality of Title VIII of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA), 16 U.S.C. Secs. 3111-3126 . ANILCA establishes a preference for subsistence hunting and fishing for rural Alaska residents. The United…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.