Norris D. Sanders v. Barry Delevan, Police Officer James M. Beene, and Blanch Cane

32 F.3d 572 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Norris D. SANDERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Barry DELEVAN, Police Officer; James M. Beene, and Blanch CANE, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15223. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 3, 1994. * Decided Aug. 15, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Norris Sanders, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. Secs. 1983 and 1985(3) actions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915 (d) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Sanders contends that Detective Delevan of the Antioch Police Department, James Beene and Blanch Cane violated his civil rights by conspiring to cause his arrest by planting false incriminating evidence on his property. Although the charges against him were dismissed, he claims that he was unlawfully deprived of his liberty, approximately $9,000 of his property and lost his job as a result of the…