United States v. Ruben Dario Cadavid, United States of America v. Daniel Mencos, AKA Rodolfo Daniel Santizo Hurtarte, United States of America v. Jose Rachid Abdala

32 F.3d 572 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ruben Dario CADAVID, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel MENCOS, aka Rodolfo Daniel Santizo Hurtarte, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Rachid ABDALA, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 93-50278, 93-50285 and 93-50315. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 7, 1994. Decided July 25, 1994. Before: FLETCHER, CANBY, and HALL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Daniel Mencos, Jose Abdala, and Ruben Cadavid appeal their jury convictions for conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute, and possession of cocaine with intent to distribute ( 21 U.S.C. Secs. 841 (a)(1) and 846). Abdala also appeals his sentence. 3 The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3231 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3742…