Darrell Cherry v. Robert Wright, Superintendent

Good Law
32 F.3d 572·1994 WL 424669·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 28945
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 15, 199493-36165California1,217 words

Opinion

Opinion

32 F.3d 572 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Darrell CHERRY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert WRIGHT, Superintendent, Respondent-Appellee. No. 93-36165. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 3, 1994. * Decided Aug. 15, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Washington state prisoner Darrell Cherry appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 habeas petition challenging his convictions of attempted murder in the first degree and endangerment of life and property with explosives. Cherry appeals the denial of the following claims: (1) improper admission of opinion evidence regarding a witness' demeanor during an investigative interview; and (2) unconstitutional search and seizure. Cherry also appeals the dismissal of several claims from which he procedurally defaulted in his state habeas proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2253 . We review de novo,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.