United States v. Real Property at 11205 McPherson Lane, Ojai, CA

32 F.3d 573 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. REAL PROPERTY AT 11205 MCPHERSON LANE, OJAI, CALIFORNIA, Defendant, and Michael Caldwell, Claimant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. REAL PROPERTY AT 11205 MCPHERSON LANE, OJAI, CALIFORNIA, Defendant, and Robin B. Caldwell, Claimant-Appellant. Nos. 93-15370, 93-15371. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 15, 1994. Decided Aug. 3, 1994. Before: GOODWIN, PREGERSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 In consolidated appeals, Michael and Robin Caldwell appeal a forfeiture order of Michael Caldwell's leasehold interest in a home at 11205 McPherson Lane, Ojai, California. The United States obtained a judgment of forfeiture under 21 U.S.C. Sec. 881 (a)(6) by summary judgment. We affirm. DISCUSSION I. Michael Caldwell's Claim 3 The disentitlement doctrine prevents fugitives from calling upon the resources…