United States v. Gerard Lamont Nelson, United States of America v. Raymond David White

Good Law
32 F.3d 573·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 28955
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 25, 199493-10077California1,241 words

Opinion

Opinion

32 F.3d 573 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gerard Lamont NELSON, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raymond David WHITE, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 93-10077, 93-10288. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 15, 1994. * Decided July 25, 1994. 1 Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Gerard Lamont Nelson appeals his conviction after a guilty plea and sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 (a)(1). Nelson's counsel has moved to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Raymond David White appeals his sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines following his jury conviction of distributing cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 (a)(1). We affirm. A. Nelson 1. Anders 4…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.