United States v. Richard H. Strawder

Good Law
32 F.3d 573·1994 WL 424645·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 28969
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 15, 199493-10334California325 words

Opinion

Opinion

32 F.3d 573 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard H. STRAWDER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-10334. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 3, 1994. * Decided Aug. 15, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Richard H. Strawder appeals pro se his 71-month sentence imposed following entry of a guilty plea to manufacturing methaqualone, in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 (a)(1); attempting to manufacture methaqualone, in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 846 , 841(a)(1); conspiring to manufacture and distribute methaqualone, in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 846 , 841(a)(1); and money laundering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1956 (a)(1)(B)(i). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 21 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 Strawder contends that the district court erred by failing to credit toward his sentence the time he spent under pretrial home detention…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.