United States v. Norman Eddy Lee
Opinion
Opinion
32 F.3d 573 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Norman Eddy LEE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-10456. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 12, 1994. Decided July 26, 1994. Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Norman Eddy Lee's probation was revoked after the district court determined that he had violated a number of his probation terms. The district court found that Lee had violated a term that directed that he "not consume or possess any alcoholic beverages" and a separate term that he "refrain from excessive use of alcohol." He also violated a term that required him to report to the probation office as directed, and he failed to notify the probation officer upon being "questioned by a law enforcement officer." Finally, he violated a term that prohibited him from committing any state crime. The district court then reinstated Lee's…