United States v. Ruben Albert Ruis

32 F.3d 573 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ruben Albert RUIS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50212. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 5, 1994. Decided Aug. 8, 1994. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, No. CR-92-00933-02-GT; Gordon Thompson, Jr., District Judge, Presiding. S.D.Cal. AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED IN PART, AND REMANDED. Before: BROWNING and FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and FITZGERALD, * District Judge MEMORANDUM ** Appellant Ruben Ruis pled guilty to one count of possessing cocaine with intent to distribute and one count of conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute. Ruis reserved the right to appeal the district court's denial of his motion to suppress evidence. On appeal, Ruis contends that the district court erred in refusing to hold an evidentiary hearing on that motion. He also argues that DEA agents…