Waller v. Blue Cross of California

Caution
32 F.3d 1337·94 Daily Journal DAR 9520·18 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1513·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 16490·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5179
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 5, 199492-55487California6,188 words

Opinion

Opinion

32 F.3d 1337 18 Employee Benefits Cas. 1513 Gerald E. WALLER; Robert C. Bryson; Harold Kurofsky; James E. Fenningham; Elizabeth Montgomery; Walter Boge, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated and Derivatively on Behalf of the Former Non-Contributory Retirement Program for Certain Employees of Blue Cross of California, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA, Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association and Leonard D. Schaeffer, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-55487. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 5, 1993. Decided July 5, 1994. Michael A. Sherman, Barrack, Rodos & Bacine, San Diego, CA, and Leonard Barrack, Barrack, Rodos & Bacine, Philadelphia, PA, and William S. Lerach, Milberg, Weiss, Bershad, Spechrie & Lerach, San Diego, CA, for plaintiffs-appellants. James C. Martin and Kurt C. Peterson, Crosby, Heafey, Roach & May; Jeffrey S. Davidson, Alexander F. MacKinnon, Kirkland & Ellis, Los Angeles, CA; James W. Rankin; and James R. Grimes, Chicago, IL, for defendants-appellees. Philip R. Hertz, Washington, DC, for amicus Pension Benefit Guar. Corp. Susan M. Green, Washington, DC, for amicus Secretary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.