Exxon Corporation v. Heinze

Good Law
32 F.3d 1399·94 Daily Journal DAR 11467·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 21908·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6273
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 17, 199492-35266California3,290 words

Opinion

Opinion

32 F.3d 1399 EXXON CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee, v. Harold C. HEINZE; Charles E. Cole, Attorney General for the State of Alaska; Ronald Swanson, Director of the Division of Lands; James E. Eason, Director of the Division of Oil and Gas, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants. Nos. 92-35266, 92-35323. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 2, 1993. Decided Aug. 17, 1994. Thomas Gibbs Gee and David D. Sterling, Baker & Botts, Houston, TX; Carl J.D. Bauman and Joseph R.D. Loescher, Hughes, Thorsness, Gantz, Powell & Brundin, Anchorage, AK, for plaintiff-appellant-cross-appellee. Bruce M. Botelho, Deputy Attorney General, Juneau, AK; and Wilson L. Condon, Deborah L. Williams, and Katheryn Bradley, Condon, Partnow & Sharrock, Anchorage, AK, for defendants-appellees-cross-appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska. Before: WRIGHT, GOODWIN, and HUG, Circuit Judges. GOODWIN, Circuit Judge: 1 Exxon Corporation ("Exxon") 1 appeals an order dismissing its 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 lawsuit and denying its prayer to enjoin certain Alaska state court litigation over state oil and gas royalties.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.