Ward v. Westinghouse Canada, Inc.

Good Law
32 F.3d 1405
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 18, 199493-15015California1,984 words

Opinion

Opinion

32 F.3d 1405 Prod.Liab.Rep. (CCH) P 13,979 Charles WARD; Glenna Jo Canum Ward, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. WESTINGHOUSE CANADA, INC.; Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Engineering Service Division, a division of Westinghouse Electric Corporation; Key Tronic Corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-15015. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 16, 1994. Decided Aug. 18, 1994. Dianna Lyons, Kazan, McClain, Edises & Simon, Oakland, CA, and Chris R. Redburn, San Francisco, CA, for plaintiffs-appellants. David M. Rosenberg-Wohl, Lasky, Haas & Cohler, San Francisco, CA, for defendants-appellees Westinghouse Canada Inc. and Westinghouse Elec. Corp. Julie A. Welsh, Archer, McComas & Lageson, Walnut Creek, CA, for defendants-appellees Key Tronic Corp. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before: GOODWIN, PREGERSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. GOODWIN, Circuit Judge: 1 Charles and Glenna Jo Canum Ward appeal a summary judgment for Westinghouse Canada, Inc. and Westinghouse Electric Corporation (Westinghouse) in the Wards' diversity action for personal injury and loss of consortium. The court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.