Ward v. Westinghouse Canada, Inc.
Opinion
Opinion
32 F.3d 1405 Prod.Liab.Rep. (CCH) P 13,979 Charles WARD; Glenna Jo Canum Ward, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. WESTINGHOUSE CANADA, INC.; Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Engineering Service Division, a division of Westinghouse Electric Corporation; Key Tronic Corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-15015. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 16, 1994. Decided Aug. 18, 1994. Dianna Lyons, Kazan, McClain, Edises & Simon, Oakland, CA, and Chris R. Redburn, San Francisco, CA, for plaintiffs-appellants. David M. Rosenberg-Wohl, Lasky, Haas & Cohler, San Francisco, CA, for defendants-appellees Westinghouse Canada Inc. and Westinghouse Elec. Corp. Julie A. Welsh, Archer, McComas & Lageson, Walnut Creek, CA, for defendants-appellees Key Tronic Corp. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before: GOODWIN, PREGERSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. GOODWIN, Circuit Judge: 1 Charles and Glenna Jo Canum Ward appeal a summary judgment for Westinghouse Canada, Inc. and Westinghouse Electric Corporation (Westinghouse) in the Wards' diversity action for personal injury and loss of consortium. The court…