Tom Chivers v. The North Slope Borough James Christensen Darlene Erickson Roger Bleth

Good Law
33 F.3d 58·1994 WL 444505·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 30851
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 18, 199493-35307California2,252 words

Opinion

Opinion

33 F.3d 58 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Tom CHIVERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH; James Christensen; Darlene Erickson; Roger Bleth, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-35307. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 5, 1994. Decided Aug. 18, 1994. Before: PREGERSON, CANBY, and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Tom Chivers, a former police officer with the North Slope Borough's Department of Public Safety, was fired for false statements he made in an affidavit. He sued the Borough and various Borough employees under 42 U.S.C. Secs. 1983 and 1985 (1988) and several state and federal criminal statutes. He now appeals the district court's dismissal and grant of summary judgment to the defendants. We AFFIRM. FACTS AND PROCEDURE 3 Tom Chivers was a corporal in the North Slope Borough Department of Public Safety in Alaska. On October 29, 1990, Chivers signed an affidavit for the plaintiffs in Ruffino v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.