Charlton v. Madigan

Good Law
33 F.3d 58·1994 WL 441830·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 30846
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 16, 199493-35279California2,360 words

Opinion

Opinion

33 F.3d 58 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Paul CHARLTON, Tom J. Davis; Jack C. Davis; Tom R. Davis; Leonore Davis; Claudine Davis, dba Tom Davis Farms Partnership; Terry Ludeman; Courtney Morse; Timmco Incorporated, a Washington corporation on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Edward MADIGAN, Secretary, U.S. Department of Agriculture; COMMODITY CREDIT CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-35279. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 13, 1994. Decided Aug. 16, 1994. Before: GOODWIN, D.W. NELSON, and HALL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Appellants, a class of wheat and barley farmers from Eastern Washington, brought this action challenging the issuance of two "Production Adjustment Disaster Notices" by the Washington State Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service ("ASCS") Committee, which operates pursuant to authority delegated to it by the Secretary of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.