J.R. Simplot Company v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. J.R. Simplot Company

33 F.3d 58 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. J.R. SIMPLOT COMPANY, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. J.R. SIMPLOT COMPANY, Respondent. Nos. 93-70569, 93-70624. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 4, 1994. Decided Aug. 24, 1994. Before ALARCON, BEEZER and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 J.R. Simplot Company ("Simplot") petitions for review of a decision and order of the National Labor Relations Board ("Board"). The Board concluded that Simplot violated sections 8(a)(1) and 8(a)(5) of the National Labor Relations Act ("the Act"), 29 U.S.C. Secs. 158 (a)(1), (5), when it refused to recognize Teamsters Local 760 ("the Union") as the collective bargaining representative of employees at its plant in Quincy, Washington. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 29 U.S.C. Sec. 160 (e) and (f), and we enforce the order. 3 * Under section 8(a)(1) of the Act,…