In Re Frederic Jerome Hammond, Debtor. Frederic Jerome Hammond v. Bank of A. Levy

33 F.3d 58 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re Frederic Jerome HAMMOND, Debtor. Frederic Jerome HAMMOND, Appellant, v. BANK OF A. LEVY, Appellee. No. 93-56577. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 3, 1994. * Decided Aug. 10, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge; HUG and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Frederic J. Hammond appeals pro se the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's dismissal, on mootness grounds, of his appeal from a bankruptcy court order lifting the automatic stay and allowing Bank of A. Levy (the Bank) to foreclose on certain real property. I. 3 Hammond and his ex-wife Nora owned certain real property in Ventura County, California. The property consisted of Hammond's residence and several additional lots that Hammond planned to develop. The property was encumbered by a deed of trust securing certain notes held by the Bank. 4 On August 4, 1992, Hammond filed a pro se petition for Chapter 11 reorganization, triggering…