Knight v. Knight

33 F.3d 58 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Roger W. KNIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Royanne M. KNIGHT; Stephen C. Pierren, Attorney; Kathryn L. Kafka, in her capacity as Assistant Attorney General of the State of Washington, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-35365. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 3, 1994. * Decided Aug. 10, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Roger W. Knight appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for defendants in Knight's 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action alleging that his civil rights were violated by the entry and enforcement of a dissolution decree. Knight also appeals the district court's denial of his motion for leave to file an amended complaint and the district court's award of Rule 11 sanctions. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. 3 * Background 4 The district court entered summary judgment for Knight's ex-wife, Royanne M.…