Roy Allen Green v. L.R. Snider, Warden

33 F.3d 58 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Roy Allen GREEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. L.R. SNIDER, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 94-15400. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 23, 1994. * Decided Aug. 25, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Roy Allen Green, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 habeas corpus petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2253 . We review de novo, McQueary v. Blodgett, 924 F.2d 829, 832 (9th Cir.1991), and we affirm. 3 Green contends his five-year sentence enhancement for a prior felony conviction imposed pursuant to Cal.Penal Code Sec. 667(a), which was enacted as part of a voter initiative measure known as Proposition Eight, is invalid because Proposition Eight was enacted in violation of California law. Specifically, Green contends Proposition Eight violated California's…