Frank J. Matylinsky, Jr. v. Ron Angelone

33 F.3d 59 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Frank J. MATYLINSKY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ron ANGELONE, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-17216. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 3, 1994. * Decided Aug. 10, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, and HUG and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Frank Matylinsky, Jr., a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for the defendants in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. Matylinsky contends that: (1) the prison disciplinary board violated his right to due process; (2) the district court failed to consider all of the evidence in granting defendants summary judgment; (3) the conditions of his imprisonment constituted cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment; (4) the denial of his request to take a polygraph examination violated his right to equal protection; (5) the prison disciplinary board failed to accord a letter from the…