Zoila Maribel Moran-Arrue v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

33 F.3d 59 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Zoila Maribel MORAN-ARRUE, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 93-70413. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 3, 1994. Decided Aug. 10, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Zoila Maribel Moran-Arrue, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") dismissal of her appeal from the immigration judge's ("IJ") decision finding her deportable as charged and denying her (1) application for asylum and withholding of deportation, and (2) alternative application for voluntary departure. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105a(a), and we deny the petition for review. 3 * Asylum 4 This court reviews the BIA's denial of asylum under section 208(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act ("Act") for an abuse of discretion. Berroteran-Melendez v. INS, 955…