Jose Luis Redondo-Lemus v. United States

33 F.3d 59 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jose Luis REDONDO-LEMUS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee. No. 94-15261. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 23, 1994. * Decided Aug. 25, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jose Luis Redondo-Lemus, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion to vacate his sentence. Redondo-Lemus contends the sentencing court erred by calculating his base offense level based upon 700, rather than 500 pounds of marijuana and by adjusting upward his Sentencing Guidelines offense level for being an organizer or manager in the offense of conviction. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Secs. 1291 , 2255. We review de novo, United States v. Angelone, 894 F.2d 1129, 1130 (9th Cir.1990), and we affirm. 3 Redondo-Lemus waived his right to attack any error in the quantity of…