Charles A. Rhinehart, AKA Charles A. Withers v. Samuel Lewis Dorothy Vigil Art Sayre Rebecca Matthews Yolanda Martinez and Mary Santin

Good Law
33 F.3d 59·1994 WL 461553·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 30883
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 25, 199492-17092California541 words

Opinion

Opinion

33 F.3d 59 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Charles A. RHINEHART, aka Charles A. Withers, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Samuel LEWIS; Dorothy Vigil; Art Sayre; Rebecca Matthews; Yolanda Martinez; and Mary Santin, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-17092. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 11, 1994. * Decided Aug. 25, 1994. 1 Before: LEAVY and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges, and MARSH, District Judge. ** 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Rhinehart argues that the district court violated Local Rule 3(a)(2) by not providing him with a copy of his deposition as a pro se litigant and that as a consequence his constitutional rights were violated. Local Rule 3(a)(2) states in relevant part: 4 Unless ordered by the Court, Deposition[s] ... shall not be filed with the court, except that a "Notice of Service" of the foregoing papers on opposing counsel shall be filed with the Court. Filing the Notice of Taking Deposition required by Rule 30(b)(1) of the Rules of Civil…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.