Charles Christopher Longsworth v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
33 F.3d 59·1994 WL 418320·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 37090
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 10, 199493-70020California1,039 words

Opinion

Opinion

33 F.3d 59 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Charles Christopher LONGSWORTH, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. Nos. 93-70020. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 15, 1994. Decided Aug. 10, 1994. 1 Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges, and TANNER, District Judge. * 2 MEMORANDUM ** I. 3 Charles Christopher Longsworth, a native and citizen of Honduras, was served with an Order to Show Cause by the Immigration and Naturalization Service charging him with remaining in the United States without authorization in violation of Sec. 241(a)(2) of the Immigration and Naturalization Act, 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1251 (a)(2). At a subsequent hearing before an immigration judge, Longsworth conceded deportability and applied for asylum under 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1101 (a)(42)(A), alleging that he was the target of intimidation by the Honduran government following his opposition campaign for a seat in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.