United States v. Edgar Marroquin, Aka: Edgar (Lnu), United States of America v. Roberto Perez

33 F.3d 60 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edgar MARROQUIN, aka: Edgar (LNU), Defendants-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ROBERTO PEREZ, Defendants-Appellant. Nos. 93-50692, 94-50104. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 5, 1994. * Decided Aug. 15, 1994. 1 Before: O'SCANNLAIN and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and MERHIGE, ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Because the parties are familiar with the facts, we do not recite them here. 4 A. Relevant Conduct to Increase Perez's Sentence 5 The district court found that 904 sets of counterfeit documents seized at the Westlake apartment were attributable to Perez for sentencing purposes. It reasoned that, pursuant to U.S.S.G. Sec. 1B1.3(a)(1)(B), possession of these documents was relevant conduct for determining Perez's offense level. Thus, under U.S.S.G. Sec. 2L2.1(b)(2)(C), Perez's offense level was increased by…