United States v. Mynor Rene Rosales

Good Law
33 F.3d 60
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 15, 199493-50516California315 words

Opinion

Opinion

33 F.3d 60 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mynor Rene ROSALES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50516. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 17, 1994. Decided Aug. 17, 1994. Memorandum Withdrawn Dec. 15, 1994. 1 Before: POOLE and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges; TANNER, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Rosales appeals from the imposition of a 180 month sentence imposed upon his pleas of guilty to violations of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 (a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. Sec. 924 (c) and (d)(1). He challenges the district court's inclusion of a 1982 conviction for manslaughter and a 1990 conviction for sale of a controlled substance. He argues that these two prior convictions were based on unconstitutionally obtained guilty pleas, and thus should have been excluded from computation of his criminal history category. We disagree. 4 In United States v. Fondren, No. 93-50470, slip op. ---- (9th Cir. August…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.