United States v. Gumaro Valdez-Corral

Good Law
33 F.3d 60·1994 WL 444622·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 30901
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 17, 199492-50623California804 words

Opinion

Opinion

33 F.3d 60 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gumaro VALDEZ-CORRAL, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50623. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 2, 1994. Decided Aug. 17, 1994. Appeal from the Decision of the United States District Court for the Central District of California; No. CR 88-00679-R, Manuel L. Real, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. [APPEALING AFTER REMAND FROM, 940 F.2d 1537 .] REVERSED AND REMANDED. 1 Before: D.W. NELSON and NOONAN, Circuit Judges, and KING, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Gumaro Valdez-Corral appeals his jury conviction, following this court's remand after reversal of the district court's denial of Valdez-Corral's motion to withdraw his guilty plea for conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute under 21 U.S.C. Secs. 846 and 841(a)(1). Valdez-Corral argues that (1) the district court erred in refusing to give an entrapment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.