United States v. Joseph Mikesell, United States of America v. Gilbert Aguilar
Opinion
Opinion
33 F.3d 60 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph MIKESELL, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gilbert AGUILAR, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 93-10617, 93-10619. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 14, 1994. Decided Aug. 17, 1994. Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judge. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Gilbert Aguilar (Aguilar) appeals his conviction under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 924 (1)(A) for falsifying his address when purchasing firearms and his sentence. Joseph John Mikesell (Mikesell) appeals his conviction for aiding and abetting Aguilar. We affirm. A. Motion to Suppress Evidence 3 Aguilar argues the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence seized at his mother's home claiming, inter alia, that the search warrant was invalid for lack of probable cause. We disagree. 4 The warrant was supported by probable cause as…