United States v. Renee Alberta Stoner
Opinion
Opinion
33 F.3d 60 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Renee Alberta STONER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50385. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 2, 1994. 1 Decided Aug. 15, 1994. 1 Before: O'SCANNLAIN AND NELSON, T.G., Circuit Judges, and Merhige, Senior District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM 3 2 Stoner appeals from the district court's order of December 4, 1992, denying her motion to suppress evidence seized during the warrantless search of her car. On February 1, 1993, appellant entered into a conditional guilty plea agreement charging her in two counts with using a communication facility in committing a narcotic felony in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 843 (b). 3 Appellant argues that her Fourth Amendment rights were violated when, after being stopped for a traffic violation, she and her passengers were questioned by the police. Appellant's detention was reasonable, and no Fourth Amendment violation…