United States v. Reginald Coleman

33 F.3d 60 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Reginald COLEMAN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-30318. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 2, 1994. Decided Aug. 16, 1994. Before: ALARCON, BEEZER and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Reginald Coleman pled guilty to conspiracy to distribute cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 846 , 841(b)(1)(A). In this appeal from the district court's judgment of sentence, Coleman contends that the district court erred in giving him a two-level, rather than a three-level, reduction for acceptance of responsibility. He also maintains that the district court erred in determining the extent of its departure from the sentencing guideline range. He argues that the district court should have deducted additional months from the guideline range because his coconspirators received lesser sentences, and that it relied upon inaccurate…