Zessman v. Sessions
Opinion
Opinion
33 F.3d 61 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Eric William ZESSMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William S. SESSIONS, Director of Federal Bureau of Investigation; Lawrence K. York, Assistant Director, Identification Division Federal Bureau of Investigation; Rex Bell, District Attorney for Clark Co. State of Nevada; John Moran, Sheriff of the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-16485. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 23, 1994. * Decided Aug. 25, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Eric William Zessman appeals pro se the dismissal of his civil rights action. Zessman argues that his complaint states a cause of action under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 because the maintenance and use of arrest records on charges that were dismissed violates the Fifth Amendment's double jeopardy clause. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and affirm. 3 * Factual Background…