In Re Ardas Yanik, Debtor. Julian Ayrs v. Ardas Yanik Lawrence A. Diamant, Chapter 7 Trustee

33 F.3d 61 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re Ardas YANIK, Debtor. Julian AYRS, Appellant, v. Ardas YANIK; Lawrence A. Diamant, Chapter 7 Trustee, Appellees. No. 93-56150. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 3, 1994. * Decided Aug. 10, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Creditor Julian Ayrs appeals pro se the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's ("BAP") dismissal of his appeal from the bankruptcy court's order denying his motion for a stay pending appeal. The BAP found Ayrs's appeal moot and dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 158 (d), and we affirm. 3 We review de novo a lowe court's decision on subject-matter jurisdiction, including questions of mootness. Sample v. Johnson, 771 F.2d 1335, 1338 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1019 (1986). "A moot action is one where the issues are no longer live or the parties lack a legally…