United States v. Daniel G. Chapel

Good Law
34 F.3d 893·94 Daily Journal DAR 12707·1994 WL 482560·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 24253·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6915
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 8, 199493-30236California2,083 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Per Curiam; concurrence by Judge KOZINSKI.

Daniel Chapel was severely injured in a single-vehicle motorcycle accident in a remote part of Glacier National Park. Several park rangers and a park medic came to his assistance. The rangers administered first aid and the medic radioed a helicopter to evacuate Chapel to the regional hospital. The medic also prepared an I.V. as a routine life support measure.

While administering first aid, the rangers noticed telltale signs that Chapel had been drinking: his breath smelled of alcohol, his speech was slurred, his eyes were bloodshot. The rangers sought to gather hard evidence of Chapel’s intoxication. They first asked Chapel to take a breathalyzer test, but he refused. Knowing that Chapel’s blood alcohol content (“BAC”) would dissipate, the rangers instructed the medic to obtain a blood sample for later testing. The medic, who had already inserted a sterile needle into Chapel’s arm to administer the I.V., withdrew a small sample of Chapel’s blood.

The rangers’ suspicions turned out to be only too well-founded. The Montana Forensic Science Lab examined Chapel’s blood sample and determined that he had a BAC of 0.21 grams of alcohol per…

Concurring Opinion

Kozinski, J.

concurring.

Eleven years ago, Judge Kennedy had the following to say about Harvey:

United States v. Harvey, 711 F.2d 144, 144-45 (9th Cir.1983) (Kennedy, J., dissenting from denial of rehearing en banc). His observations are only more apt today in light of Winston v. Lee, 470 U.S. 753, 759 , 105 S.Ct. 1611, 1616 , 84 L.Ed.2d 662 (1985), where the Court remarked that Schmerber “fell within the exigent-circumstances exception to the warrant requirement.”

We should have taken Harvey en banc in 1983. It’s not too late.

Opinion

34 F.3d 893 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel G. CHAPEL, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-30236. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 1, 1994 * . Decided Sept. 8, 1994. David M. Ortley, Kalispell, MT, for defendant-appellant. Dennis Hester, Kalispell, MT, for plaintiff-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana. Before: WRIGHT, KOZINSKI and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam; concurrence by Judge KOZINSKI. PER CURIAM. 1 Daniel Chapel was severely injured in a single-vehicle motorcycle accident in a remote part of Glacier National Park. Several park rangers and a park medic came to his assistance. The rangers administered first aid and the medic radioed a helicopter to evacuate Chapel to the regional hospital. The medic also prepared an I.V. as a routine life support measure. 2 While administering first aid, the rangers noticed telltale signs that Chapel had been drinking: his breath smelled of alcohol, his speech was slurred, his eyes were bloodshot. The rangers sought to gather hard evidence of Chapel's intoxication. They first asked Chapel to take a breathalyzer test, but he refused. Knowing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.