Cash Flow Investors, Incorporated, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Union Oil Company of California, a California Corporation, Dba Unocal, Defendant-Appellee/cross-Appellant
Opinion
Opinion
34 F.3d 1071 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. CASH FLOW INVESTORS, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, A California corporation, dba Unocal, Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant. Nos. 93-35157, 93-35206. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 11, 1994. Decided Aug. 12, 1994. 1 Before: TANG and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges, and HENDERSON * , District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Cash Flow Investors, Inc. ("Cash Flow"), the owner of a previous gas station site, sought contribution under Oregon's Hazardous Waste Act, O.R.S. Secs. 465.200 et seq., from Union Oil Company of American (dba "Unocal") for costs associated with the clean-up of environmental contamination from an underground gasoline storage tank. Cash Flow appeals the amount of contribution awarded by the district court, and Unocal cross-appeals the district court's award of prejudgment interest. We affirm in part and reverse in…