Zoltan Bodo v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

34 F.3d 1071 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Zoltan BODO, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 92-70246. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 4, 1993. * Decided Aug. 11, 1994. 1 Before: REINHARDT and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and KAUFMAN, ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 A Hungarian alien seeks review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming the immigration judge's denial of the alien's application for asylum, 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1158 , and withholding of deportation, 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1253 (h). The BIA entered a final order of deportation against the petitioner. We have jurisdiction to review the deportation order pursuant to section 106 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105 (a). We deny the petition. BACKGROUND 4 The petitioner, Zoltan Bodo, entered the United States on July 3, 1987 as a nonimmigrant visitor for pleasure. He applied to the Immigration and…