Arthur W. Carson v. Michael Hennessey, Sheriff Robert Roper, Sergeant

34 F.3d 1071 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Arthur W. CARSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael HENNESSEY, Sheriff; Robert Roper, Sergeant, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15445. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 23, 1994. * Decided Aug. 29, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Arthur W. Carson, a Texas state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for defendants in Carson's 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action alleging that he was transferred to administrative segregation in retaliation for filing grievances regarding his access to the law library. Carson also appeals the district court's denial of his request to continue discovery. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 * Background 4 Carson brought this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 against three employees of the San Francisco Sheriff's Department alleging that defendants…