Costantini v. Medical Bd. of California

34 F.3d 1071 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. A.V. COSTANTINI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MEDICAL BOARD OF CALIFORNIA, Ken Douglas, Gerald McClellan, Alfred Stich, Kenneth Wagstaff, Daniel E. Lungren; James P. Fox, Parker Kelly and San Mateo District Attorney; County, Jack Posnick, Jonathan Feinberg, and Alfredo Terrazas, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-16926. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 3, 1994. * Decided Aug. 11, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge; HUG and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Antonio V. Costantini appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his amended complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). We affirm. I. FACTS AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS 3 Costantini was the principal officer of Consultants Medical Group, Inc. ("CMG"), which ran a chain of weight loss clinics in the San Francisco area. In 1990 the Medical Board of California (the Board) received information that CMG clinics were dispensing…