Anderson v. Lewis & Clark County

34 F.3d 1071 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Roger E. ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LEWIS & CLARK COUNTY; State of Montana, acting by and through the Lewis & Clark County Sheriff's Department; Charles M. O'Reilly, in his official capacity as Sheriff and individually; Robert C. Bourassa, in his official capacity as Captain Detention Division and individually, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-35454. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 4, 1994. * Decided Aug. 26, 1994. 1 Before: KOZINSKI and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges, and REAL, ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Roger Anderson appeals the district court's entry of summary judgment in favor of Lewis and Clark County, Montana, and other defendants on his claims under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 . Anderson claimed that he was deprived of a property interest in his continued public employment without due process of law and that he was terminated in violation of his First Amendment…