Leroy Griffin, AKA Lee v. Sargent Controls Inc.

Good Law
34 F.3d 1072·1994 WL 465840·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 32091
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 29, 199494-15123California1,506 words

Opinion

Opinion

34 F.3d 1072 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Leroy GRIFFIN, aka Lee, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SARGENT CONTROLS INC.; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15123. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 23, 1994. * Decided Aug. 29, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Leroy Griffin appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for defendants in Griffin's employment discrimination action filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ("Title VII"), 42 U.S.C. Secs. 2000e-2000e-17 and the Arizona Civil Rights Act ("ACRA"), Ariz.Rev.Stat. Secs. 41-1401-84. Griffin also appeals the district court's order denying Griffin's motion for new trial. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. 3 We review de novo the district court's summary judgment. See Robinson v. Adams, 847 F.2d 1315, 1316 (9th Cir.1988) (as amended), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1105 (1989).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.