Andrew Dolfini v. Samuel Lewis

34 F.3d 1072 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Andrew DOLFINI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Samuel LEWIS, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-17284. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 3, 1994. * Decided Aug. 9, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Andrew Dolfini, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant prison officials in Dolfini's 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. Dolfini contends that the defendants were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review de novo, Ferguson v. Greater Pocatello Chamber of Commerce, Inc., 848 F.2d 976, 979 (9th Cir.1988), and we affirm. 3 "Summary judgment is appropriate if the moving party presents evidence that shows that no genuine issue of material fact exists and that it is entitled to…