Mark Frederick Durbin v. Local 52 International Longshoremen's and Warehousemens Union Pacific Maritime Association

34 F.3d 1072 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Mark Frederick DURBIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOCAL 52 INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN'S AND WAREHOUSEMENS UNION; Pacific Maritime Association, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-35068. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 3, 1994. * Decided Aug. 9, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Mark Frederick Durbin appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for defendants in Durbin's action for tortious breach of employment contract and unjust termination of employment. The district court determined that Durbin's claims are (1) preempted by section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act ("LMRA"), 29 U.S.C. Sec. 185 , and (2) time-barred. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review de novo, see Carr v. Pacific Maritime Ass'n, 904 F.2d 1313, 1315 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1084 (1991), and affirm. 3 Durbin contends…