Gmi Holdings, Inc. v. Bill Bailey Bill D/B/A Genie Garage Door Service

34 F.3d 1072 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. GMI HOLDINGS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bill BAILEY; Bill D/B/A Genie Garage Door Service, Defendants-Appellants. No. 92-56437. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 3, 1994. * Decided Aug. 9, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Bill Bailey, dba Genie Garage Door Service ("Bailey"), appeals pro se the district court's order awarding to plaintiff GMI Holdings, Inc. ("GMI") attorneys' fees and costs in the amount of $12,126.27 after GMI prevailed on its motion to hold Bailey in contempt of a consent decree in which Bailey agreed to discontinue using the trademark "Genie", a trademark owned by GMI. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review for abuse of discretion, Transgo, Inc. v. Ajac Transmission Parts Corp., 768 F.2d 1001, 1014 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1059 (1986), and affirm. 3 Bailey contends that…