Dixianne Hawks v. County of Butte

34 F.3d 1072 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Dixianne HAWKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF BUTTE, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-15346. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 7, 1994. * Memorandum Filed Feb. 16, 1994. Memorandum vacated Aug. 30, 1994. Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 Appellant's petition for rehearing is granted. The panel has voted to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc and no active judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed.R.App.P. 35. The suggestion for rehearing en banc is rejected. 2 The unpublished memorandum disposition filed February 16, 1994 is vacated. The Clerk of the Court is directed to file the attached memorandum disposition. 3 MEMORANDUM ** 4 Dixianne Hawks appeals the district court's dismissal of her 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action as frivolous under 28…