O'Leary v. California Highway Patrol

Good Law
34 F.3d 1073·1994 WL 465829·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 32113
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 29, 199493-55597California1,123 words

Opinion

Opinion

34 F.3d 1073 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. A.C. O'LEARY, Plaintiff-Cross-Defendant-Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, Defendant, and Bill Brown; Larry Veale; J. McLenson; S. Debolt, Defendants-Appellees, Paul F. Nissley, dba Kelmark Towing; Linda Nissley, Cross-Complainants-Appellees. No. 93-55597. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 23, 1994. * Decided Aug. 29, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 A.C. O'Leary appeals pro se the district court's judgment for the defendants in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action alleging his due process rights were violated by the process afforded him after his vehicle was towed from a freeway on-ramp and impounded. 1 We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 This court reviews for clear error a district court's findings of fact, giving due regard to the trial court's opportunity to determine the credibility of witnesses.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.