In re Stock

34 F.3d 1073 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re Edward C. STOCK, aka Stock Ranches, Debtor, Edward C. STOCK; David P. Sweeney, Appellants, v. HARBICHT RESEARCH, INC. EMPLOYEES PROFIT SHARING PLAN; William W. McEwen, Jr., Inc. Pension Plan; Vena J. MacKinnon; Mobilehome Properties, Inc. Pension Plan; Fred W. Cluff; Virginia E. Cluff; Chester N. Jensen; Frances Jensen, Appellees. No. 93-55826. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 23, 1994. * Decided Aug. 29, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Debtor Edward C. Stock and creditor David P. Sweeney, appeal pro se the decision of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel ("BAP") affirming the bankruptcy judge's order dismissing Stock's bankruptcy case for failure to file a timely Chapter 12 plan pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Sec. 1221 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 26 Sec. 158(d). We review de novo a decision of the BAP, see Estate of Catli v. Catli…